Influence of shock pressure testing on the service life of HDPE piping systems [PE]

# 2010 Vancouver

The completion of a pressure test is mandatory for all new pipe systems. Its purpose is to demonstrate the overall leak-proof condition of the system. In the course of this test, HDPE pipes of SDR 17 class are exposed to high stress loads. In an extensive test programme, all failure mechanisms observed in long-term hydrostatic (creep rupture) strength testing were examined. The results show that SDR 17 pipes made of PE 100 grade HDPE material will clearly exceed the required 50-year minimum service life even after shock pressure testing.

Before a new piping system is put into service, it must be shock pressure tested according to EN 805 [1], irrespective of the pipe material employed. The aim of this test is to confirm the tightness of the entire system, and specifically of its joints and fittings, at an elevated internal pressure.
Piping systems for the distribution of drinking water must attain a service life of at least 50, if not 100, years. They are typically rated for a 10 bar operating pressure and are predominantly made of HDPE pipes. In the case of performance class PE 100 material, wall thickness class SDR 17 piping will be used to meet this pressure requirement [2]. Since pressure surges in such local supply networks are virtually impossible to compute, the test pressure for the shock pressure test according to EN 805 includes a fixed-rate surge allowance which brings up the test pressure to 15 bar [1]. In accordance with EN 805, this test pressure must act on the tested HDPE piping system for at least 1.5 hrs at a test temperature of 20 °C [1, Appendix A.27].

The above shock pressure test places a high stress on HDPE piping. For a 15 bar test pressure, the boiler formula yields a circumferential stress level of 12 MPa. In the creep rupture strength diagram for a 1.5 h load cycle, this value lies just under the 20°C reference curve for PE 100. This “flat” arm marking the minimum strength requirement is defined by two reference points, viz., 100 h/12,4 MPa (soon to be amended to 100 h/12,0 MPa) and 50 years/10.0 MPa.
Although it is already evident from the foregoing that the shock pressure test will not create unacceptably high circumferential stress in the pipe wall, it is the aim of this paper to review, by means of systematic model trials and practice-based investigations, the potential effects of a shock pressure test on the service lifetime of a HDPE pipe system. To this end, all failure modes observed on HDPE piping – ductile failure, brittle fracture after slow crack growth, brittle fracture in the wake of thermooxidative degradation – will be taken into account.

Please note that the whole article content is available on PPCA website onlySource : 2010 Vancouver


Related papers

Polyolefin Sewer Pipes – 100 Year Lifetime Expectancy

Author(s) : Tiem Meijering, Jeannette Mulder, Günter Dreiling, Heinz Vogt 2014 Chicago

In this study, it has been demonstrated that a 100 years service-lifetime for non-pressure sewage pipes, solid wall pipes and structured-wall pipes of PE and PP, can be expected provided some basic conditions are met. It has been demonstrated that the resistance to thermo-oxidative degradation of the applied materials...

ACCELERATED MATERIAL TESTING WITH CYCLIC CRB TESTS

Author(s) : Andreas Frank, Anita Redhead, Thomas Kratochvilla, Heinz Dragaun, Gerald Pinter 2012 Barcelona

Key words : Polyethylene, pipe, test method, lifetime, slow crack growth For a qualitative characterization of the slow crack growth resistance of polyethylene pipe grades several test methods are available. Especially for modern pipe grades these test methods exceed practical time frames and new acceleration...

ARE METHODS FOR TIGHTNESS TESTING FIT FOR PURPOSE?

Author(s) : Lars Jacobsson, Hans Andersson and Linda Karlsson 2012 Barcelona

Problems sometimes occur in tightness testing of plastic pipelines using pressurized water and accounting for the diametrical expansion, particularly so for larger sizes and higher pressure rating. Pipelines that are in fact tight enough for acceptance are rejected when first tested. A study consisting of two parts...

Contribution of the Plastic Pipe Industry to the PVC Voluntary Commitment

Author(s) : Telgen Hans 2012 Barcelona

Abstract : In 2000 the PVC chain embarked in a ten year program to improve the environmental footprint of the PVC industry : Vinyl 2010. Challenging targets have been fixed and all of them have been achieved : recycling, substitution of heavy metals, energy saving etc. The pipe industry and specially...

HARMONISATION OF POLYETHYLENE PIPE BUTTFUSION PROCEDURES AND TEST METHODS – FINAL CONCLUSIONS

Author(s) : Stephen Beech, Christophe Salles, Ulrich Schulte 2012 Barcelona

Polyethlyene, Pipes, Buttfusion, Joining, Testing Several well established procedures are used for butt fusion welding of PE pipes globally. The most widely used are the European Single Pressure, UK Dual Pressure, and the USA High Pressure procedures. In the future it may be possible to rationalise these procedures....

THE FUNCTIONING OF FLANGE JOINTS — FINDINGS FROM FULL SCALE EXPERIMENTS AND FEM ANALYSES

Author(s) : Lars Jacobsson, Hans Andersson, Daniel Vennetti and Sven-Erik Sällberg 2012 Barcelona

Leakages are reported in flange joints of large pipelines for water supply although mounted according to recommended practise. FEM analyses and full scale experiments have been performed in order to better understand the functioning of the joints. The objectives were to find out about the sensitivity to mounting...

COMPARISON OF NOVEL TESTING METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF SLOW CRACK GROWTH IN PE 100

Author(s) : Christian Tischler, Markus Haager, Thomas R. Kratochvilla, Heinz Muschik, Heinz Dragaun 2010 Vancouver

The static test method of the Notched Ring Test (NRT) is compared with a fatigue testing method of Cracked Round Bar (CRB). Both methods are candidates for the classification of polyethylene (PE) materials with high resistance against Slow Crack Growth (SCG). In this paper tests of two PE 100 and two PE 100-RC...

DURABILITY OF POLYPROPYLENE PIPES FOR NONPRESSURE APPLICATIONS– INFLUENCE FROM SURFACE DAMAGE AND POINT LOADS

Author(s) : Sven-Erik Sällberg, Kristian Thörnblom, Hans Sandberg 2010 Vancouver

As trenchless installation techniques and coarse-grained backfill materials are gaining in interest for plastics pipelines, the influence from surface damage on the technical lifetime is becoming more and more important. For non-pressure applications, such as gravity sewers, this aspect is relevant, e.g., when...

POLYOLEFIN PIPE GRADES WITH IMPROVED RESISTANCE TO WATER DISINFECTANTS

Author(s) : H.Vogt 2010 Vancouver

Water is essential for human life. More than one billion people worldwide do not have access to safe water supply. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that more than 4,000 people die each day from diarrheal diseases resulting from unsafe water and lack of sanitation. Ninety percent are children under the...

50 Years of Pipes made from High Density PE

Author(s) : Schulte 2006 Washington DC

After the discovery of the low-pressure process for the production of polyethylene with the aid of Ziegler catalysts, only another year went by before pipes were being extruded in highdensity polyethylene. In the same year, at the end of 1954, Hoechst had already begun to carry out long-term failure tests on HDPE...

Members of the Association

BOREALISBOROUGEINEOS O&PIRPCKorea Petrochemical IND. Co., LTDLyondellBasellPetroChina Dushanzi Petrochemical CompanyPRIME POLYMERSABICSCG Chemicals & Thai PolyethyleneSinopecTASNEE
TOP