Our site uses cookies necessary for its proper functioning. To improve your experience, other cookies may be used: you can choose to disable them. This can be changed at any time via the Cookies link at the bottom of the page.

Butt fusion cooling times, speeding up the process - Effect of ambient temperatures



Plastic Pipes Conference Association # 2012 Barcelona

Striplin Ted

This author presented the thought provoking paper “Butt Fusion Cooling Times, Speeding Up the Process” at Plastic Pipes XV held in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.. That presentation discussed testing of heavy walled pipe using various fusion standards and the resulting cooling times with relative joint strength. The tests revealed the interfacial temperature and the actual time required to cool the joint interface to a safe temperature before removing from a machine and handling the pipe That information gave us the actual joint temperature when the pipe can be and currently is being removed from machines according to ISO, German, British and USA Standards. The testing noted differences in interfacial temperatures at the end of the cooling cycle and the actual strength of the joint when it is lifted from the machine. Also some controversy arose because of the question as to whether ambient temperature has an effect on cooling times of butt fused joints. Do ambient temperature differences account for the high interface temperature in fusions using certain parameters? Do the differences in ambient temperatures from one locale to another prohibit use of some parameters being used safely in that climate without modification? If the cool temperature target is 90° C in an average ambient temperature of 15° C, what happens when the same cooling time is used in a climate with an average ambient temperature of 26° C? This paper reviews the testing to date which attempts to answer those important questions.

Please note that the whole article content is available on PPCA website only :

Related papers

2014 Chicago : Joining Methods for Thermoplastic lined pipelines

Author(s) : Ted Compton, Jeff Schell

For decades, energy companies have used thermoplastic liners to protect pipelines from internal corrosion and abrasion. Liner systems can be a simple and cost effective means to extend the life of an asset and protect the environment. Many advances in technology have occurred over the years and thermoplastic liners...

2010 Vancouver : Butt fusion cooling times, speeding up the process

Author(s) : Ted Striplin

The polyethylene (PE) pipe system has many attributes that make it the most reliable and highest quality system within the prescribed pressure and temperature limitations. However, the process itself is the weakest link in the PE pipe sales chain. While easier to join in large diameters, it can require the most time...

2006 Washington DC : Fusing at Higher Interfacial Pressures

Author(s) : Striplin

In the early days of polyethylene piping use, there was no forum, such as the Plastics Pipe Conference, where information could be disseminated and technical experience exchanged. Thus, each piping community, whether a pipe manufacturer, gas or water company, or technical body, developed their own philosophies and...

1998 Gothenburg : Non-Destructive Testing of Electrofused Joints and Large Diameter Gas Pipes

Author(s) : Striplin

The Gas Research Institute and McElroy Manufacturing, Inc. cofunded Project 5091-271-2341 to increase the capability of the UltraMc” Computerized Ultrasonic Inspection System. This project added the 2” Iron Pipe Size (IPS), 3” IPS, 6” IPS, 8” IPS, 10” IPS, 12”, IPS, 50 mm Japan Industrial Size (JIS), 75 mm JIS, 100 mm...

Members of the Association

BOREALISBOROUGEFormosa Plastics CorporationHanwha TotalEnergiesINEOS O&PIRPCKorea Petrochemical IND. Co., LTD (KPIC)LyondellBasellORLEN UnipetrolPetroChina Dushanzi Petrochemical CompanyPRIME POLYMERSABICSCG Chemicals & Thai PolyethyleneSinopecTASNEE